State v. Mitchell
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Mitchell (Conn. 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Philip MITCHELL.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
James M. Ralls, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
Charles F. Willson, special public defender, in opposition.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 108 Conn.App. 388, 948 A.2d 335 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's statement was admitted in violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and if so, was this harmful error requiring a new trial?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18219.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.