Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.
Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.
953 A.2d 653; 288 Conn. 908; 2008 Conn. LEXIS 315
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Humphrey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (Conn. 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 796 (AC 28914), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to apply the mode of operation rule as articulated in Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 467, 806 A.2d 546, cert. denied, 262 Conn. 912, 810 A.2d 278 (2002), to this slip and fall case?”
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18181.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.