Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008

Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.

Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided July 9, 2008
953 A.2d 653; 288 Conn. 908; 2008 Conn. LEXIS 315 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 796 (AC 28914), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*909 James R. Fogarty, in support of the petition. Decided July 9, 2008

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to apply the mode of operation rule as articulated in Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 467, 806 A.2d 546, cert. denied, 262 Conn. 912, 810 A.2d 278 (2002), to this slip and fall case?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18181.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑