Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008

State v. Tunick

State v. Tunick
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided October 30, 2008
289 Conn. 943; 959 A.2d 1011; 2008 Conn. LEXIS 507

State v. Tunick

Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 109 Conn. App. 611 (AC 28461), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the defendant’s conviction, without first remanding the case to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether the trial judge had actively participated in pretrial negotiations?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*944Decided October 30, 2008 Richard Emanuel, in support of the petition. Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.