Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. Randall
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. Randall, 293 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2009)
978 A.2d 1110; 2009 Conn. LEXIS 438
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. Randall
Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn. App. 89 (AC 29572), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the trial court properly supplied purported missing terms to a restrictive covenant in the subject employment agreement without resorting to the equitable remedy of reformation?”
ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- HILB ROGAL AND HOBBS COMPANY v. UTA PETERS RANDALL
- Status
- Published