The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 330 (AC 29617), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 53a-183 (a) (3), harassment in the second degree, proscibes only the physical conduct involved in making a telephone call but not the verbal content thereof? If not, was the lack of an instruction on the definition of a ‘true threat’ harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the lack of an instruction on the definition of a ‘true threat,’ for purposes of proof of breach of the peace in the second degree under General Statutes § 53a-181 (a) (3), was not harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt?”