Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011

Simms v. Seaman

Simms v. Seaman
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided September 7, 2011
27 A.3d 373; 302 Conn. 915 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Simms v. Seaman

Opinion

27 A.3d 373 (2011)
302 Conn. 915

Robert SIMMS
V,
Penny Q. SEAMAN et al.

SC 18839

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided September 7, 2011.

John R. Williams, New Haven, in support of the petition.

Raymond J. Plouffe, Jr., Shelton, Nadine M. Pare, Cheshire, Patrick M. Noonan, and Matthew H. Geelan, Guilford, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 129 Conn.App. 651, 23 A.3d 1, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that claims of fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress brought against attorneys for conduct that occurred during judicial proceedings were barred as a matter of law by the doctrine of absolute immunity?"

NORCOTT and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.