Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012

CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. Drown

CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. Drown
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided May 30, 2012
44 A.3d 183; 305 Conn. 908; 2012 WL 2330261; 2012 Conn. LEXIS 256 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. Drown

Opinion

44 A.3d 183 (2012)
305 Conn. 908

CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION
v.
Joshua DROWN et al.

SC 18975

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 30, 2012.

Sean K. McElligott, Bridgeport, in support of the petition.

Thomas P. O'Connor, Greenwich, and Charles W. Pleterse, in opposition.

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 140, 37 A.3d 820, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that exclusion (i) of the Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange (MUX) policy unambiguously excluded coverage in this case?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association had immunity for the actions of MUX committed prior to MIIX's insolvency?"

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑