State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL
Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL, 40 A.3d 784 (Conn. 2012)
304 Conn. 906; 2012 WL 1435481; 2012 Conn. LEXIS 149
State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Stephen V. Manning and Donna R. Zito, in support of the petition.
Jane R. Rosenberg and Lynn D. Wittenbrink, assistant attorneys general, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 479, 36 A.3d 252, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the subpoena power conferred upon the claims commissioner by General Statutes § 4-151(c) permits him to subpoena documents from a respondent that has not been named as a party to the suit that the claims commissioner has been asked to authorize?"
Reference
- Cited By
- 9 cases
- Status
- Published