Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2016

Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.

Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided September 20, 2016
149 A.3d 980; 323 Conn. 911; 2016 Conn. LEXIS 284 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.

Opinion of the Court

Deren Manasevit, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The respondent's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn. App. 1, 140 A.3d 402 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the habeas court incorrectly rendered judgment for the respondent on the petitioner's claim that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to portions of the testimony of Tanika McCotter in a transcript admitted under the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, on the ground that they were 'double hearsay'?"

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.