State v. Jordan
State v. Jordan
150 A.3d 1150; 323 Conn. 920
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Jordan
Opinion of the Court
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the preclusion of the initial aggressor evidence was harmless error?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the victim's subsequent domestic violence convictions as evidence that he was the initial aggressor during the defendant's barroom assault?"
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.