Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2017

Meadowbrook Ctr., Inc. v. Buchman

Meadowbrook Ctr., Inc. v. Buchman
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Decided February 1, 2017
154 A.3d 1007; 324 Conn. 918; 2017 Conn. LEXIS 53 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Meadowbrook Ctr., Inc. v. Buchman

Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 169 Conn. App. 527, 151 A.3d 404 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly rule that the time limitation contained in the rules of practice governing motions for attorney's fees in Practice Book § 11-21 is directory and not mandatory?"

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.