Trover for Franklin stoves fixed in the fireplaces of the house which the defendant purchased of the plaintiff. They were fixed in the usual manner with bricks and mortar. The jury found that when the plaintiff sold the house to the defendant, he expected to *100be paid for the stoves in addition to the price of the house. The cases cited were, Lawton v. Lawton, 3 Atk. 13; 2 Bac. Ab. 420, Gwillim’s edition.

Judgment for the defendant, it being a case between vendor and vendee.