Dickey v. Harmon
Concurring Opinion
concurred, because he considered the draft in favor of Sackett, as a security only, and not an assignment of the fund, and that by the 31st section of the bankrupt law he could not be relieved for more than a ratable part of his debt.
Opinion of the Court
took time to consider; and at June term, 1805, were of opinion that the complainants, Dickey & Tom, assignees of the bankrupts, were entitled to the money in the hands of Jameson.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Dickey & Tom, Assignees of Harmon & Davis Bankrupts v. Harmon & Davis & others
- Status
- Published