Dickey v. Harmon

District Court, District of Columbia
Dickey v. Harmon, 1 D.C. 201 (1804)

Dickey v. Harmon

Concurring Opinion

Cranch, J.,

concurred, because he considered the draft in favor of Sackett, as a security only, and not an assignment of the fund, and that by the 31st section of the bankrupt law he could not be relieved for more than a ratable part of his debt.

Opinion of the Court

The CouRT

took time to consider; and at June term, 1805, were of opinion that the complainants, Dickey & Tom, assignees of the bankrupts, were entitled to the money in the hands of Jameson.

Reference

Full Case Name
Dickey & Tom, Assignees of Harmon & Davis Bankrupts v. Harmon & Davis & others
Status
Published