Ruskin v. Coe

District Court, District of Columbia
Ruskin v. Coe, 58 F. Supp. 424 (1945)
64 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 365; 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2656

Ruskin v. Coe

Opinion of the Court

BAILEY, Justice.

The plaintiff is seeking a patent on a calcium salt of laevo-ascorbic acid for use as a therapeutical agent. This salt is old and using it as a medical preparation is not invention. However, the plaintiff is also claiming a patent on this salt mixed with an anti-oxidation stabilizing agent. By the use of this combination he has rendered this calcium salt, which was not before apparently of any use, a useful therapeutical agent. I think, therefore, he is entitled to a patent comprising his claims numbered 23 and 30, which are as follows:

“23. A medicinal preparation for injection into the animal organism for the treatment of calcium deficiency diseases and consisting essentially of a substantially pure calcium salt of laevo ascorbic acid mixed with an anti-oxidation stabilizing agent.
“30. The method of obtaining a medicinal preparation consisting essentially of substantially pure calcium laevo-ascorbate, which comprises reacting an aqueous solution of substantially pure laevo-ascorbic acid with calcium carbonate, whereby carbon dioxide remains dissolved in the solution of the calcium salt, and adding to the solution an anti-oxidation stabilizing agent.”

The remaining claims are denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
RUSKIN v. COE, Com'r of Patents
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published