Fund for Animals v. Babbitt
Cases that cite this one
48 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Loving v. Internal Revenue Service (District Court, District of Columbia 2013)
- Ark Initiative v. Tidwell (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
- Humane Society of the United States v. United States Department of Agriculture (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
- National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Jewell (District Court, District of Columbia 2014)
- Alston v. Geithner (District Court, District of Columbia 2013)
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (District Court, District of Columbia 2013)
- Center for Food Safety v. Salazar (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
- Illinois Commercial Fishing Association v. Salazar (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
- Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. National Labor Relations Board (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
- Gentiva Healthcare Corporation v. Sebelius (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
- Powers v. Donley (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
- Wilson v. McHugh (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
- Powers v. Donley (D.C. Cir. 2012)
- Wilhelmus v. Geren (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
- Brodie v. United States Department of Health & Human Services (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
- Whidden Memorial Hospital v. Sebelius (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
- Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Sebelius (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Sebelius (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
- Bensman v. National Park Service (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
- Wilhelmus v. Geren (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
- Brodie v. United States Department of Health and Human Services (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
- Doctors for America v. Office of Personnel Management (District Court, District of Columbia 2025)
- Center for Bio. Diversity v. Deb Haaland (9th Cir. 2023)
- Williams v. Vista (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2022)
- Kinsley v. Blinken (District Court, District of Columbia 2021)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of the parties’ joint motion for approval of their settlement agreement and limited relief under Rule 60(b), and in accordance with this Court’s January 29, 1997, opinion, it is hereby ordered that the parties’ settlement agreement is approved and it is further ordered that the Court’s September 29, 1995, Opinion is hereby amended as follows:
(1) The clause in the last sentence of footnote 7, which reads, “and because under the statute that factor alone may have been sufficient to justify listing the bear, 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(c)” is hereby vacated; and
(2) The words “past” and “historic” in the last sentence of footnote 7 are hereby vacated.
The clerk is directed to submit a copy of the amended opinion with the vacated portions deleted to West’s Reporting Service for publication.
This case is hereby dismissed, except with regard to any claim for attorneys fees’ and costs, and except that any party may move to enforce any aspect of the Court’s September 29, 1995, order as amended, or to enforce the settlement agreement filed with the Court along with the parties’ joint Rule 60(b) motion;
Any claim for attorneys’ fees and costs will be resolved in accordance with ¶8 of the parties’ settlement agreement.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.