Bynum v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Nehemiah Kong v. Image of Beverly Hills, LLC (United States District Court for the Central District of California 2020)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs motion for relief pursuant to Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and defendants’ cross-motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, for clarification. Plaintiffs motion requests that the Court amend its March 31, 2000 Order and Judgment in this case to *5 eliminate the final paragraph dismissing the case "with prejudice. Defendant’s cross-motion does not contest this amendment, but instead requests that the Court amend its Order and Judgment to approve the recent amendments to the Capitol Police’s regulations. Upon consideration of the parties’ motions, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for relief pursuant to Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is GRANTED. The final ordering paragraph of the Court’s March 31, 2000 Order and Judgment was included as a result of a clerical error; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ cross-motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, for clarification is DENIED. The Capitol Police’s amended regulation is not before the Court; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court’s March 31, 2000 Order and Judgment is VACATED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the Amended Order and Judgment issued this same day.
SO ORDERED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.