w

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA "UN 3 9 2009

Julia Miller, ) C|gf’lk",ft:nd

Plaintiff, §

v, § civil A¢rion NO. 09 1181 United States Public Health § Service Commissioned Corps et al., )

Defendants. l

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(e), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § l915(e)(2)(B)(i).

Plaintiff, a resident of Honolulu, Hawaii, accuses employees of the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, who claim to be "physicians who treated me before at the Medical Center in Detroit, Michigan[,]" of "stalking me from state to state, harassing me, threatening me and screaming and hollering sarcastic, slanderous statements . . . creating a civil unrest." Compl. at l. She also accuses them of "pacing the street where I temporarily reside" and of stealing her mail, among other misdeeds. Ia'. Plaintiff then switches to a seemingly unrelated narrative about President Barack Obama, other public officials and certain business entities. See id. at 2-5. She wants this Court "to investigate my allegations against the Democratic Party who is out to get me[,]" id. at 4, and to "assist" with "informing a local Law Enforcement Agency to file a

complaint against the [Commissioned Corps] so that I can obtain a restraining order." Id. at l.

The complaint not only presents the type of fantastic or delusional scenarios found to justify immediate dismissal of a complaint as frivolous, Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 3l9, 328 (1989); Besl v. Kelly,

(D.C. Cir. 1994), but it is frivolous also because it lacks "an arguable basis in law and fact." Brandon v. District of Columbia Bd. of Parole, 734

F.Zd 56, 59 (D.C. Cir. 1984). A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum

Opinion.

"/ZS<WF

rd United`St‘ates District Judge

Date: June% , 2009