Kelly v. Barreto
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________ ) KEVIN R. KELLY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-0900 (PLF) ) DARRYL HAIRSTON, ) Acting Administrator, United States ) Small Business Administration,1 ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [38] is GRANTED
in part and DENIED in part; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is
DENIED with respect to plaintiff’s claims of unlawful discrimination and retaliation, both under
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq.; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is
GRANTED with respect to plaintiff’s claim of age discrimination under the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967,
29 U.S.C. §§ 621, et seq.; it is
1 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint names former Administrator Hector Barreto as the party defendant. The Court now substitutes his successor, Acting Administrator Darryl Hairston, pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in defendant’s favor with respect
to plaintiff’s claim of age discrimination; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before April 15, 2009, the parties shall meet,
confer and file a joint report informing the Court how they wish to proceed with this case.
SO ORDERED.
/s/_________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge
DATE: March 31, 2009
2
Reference
- Status
- Published