SUPPLEMENTARY INTERROGATORY RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEFENDANT STATE STREET BANK & TRUST COMPANY

Did SSBT consider whether any Identify the date of any meetings or other breach of fiduciary duty claims consideration of this subject; the committee, existed based on allegations in person(s) and/or entity participating in the Illinois securities litigation? consideration; whether the meeting was in person, telephonic, or otherwise; the subject 3 matter of such discussions; any conclusions reached; all communications, if any, between State Street and the Plans on this subject; and, by Bates number, any documents evidencing such consideration. Did SSBT consider whether Plan Identify the date of any meetings at which this had any claims arising out of those subject was considered; the committee, allegations? person(s) and/or entity participating in the consideration; whether the meeting was in 4 person, telephonic, or otherwise; the subject matter of such discussions; any conclusions reached; and, by Bates number, any documents evidencing such consideration. Did SSBT consider whether Plans Answer the interrogatory in its entirety. had additional sources of recovery, 5 such as fiduciary liability insurance, in the Illinois Securities Litigation? Did SSBT consider whether Plans Identify the date of any meetings or other should seek additional recovery consideration of this subject; the committee, for release of ERISA breach person(s) and/or entity participating in the claims in the Illinois Securities consideration; whether the meeting was in 7 litigation? person, telephonic, or otherwise; the subject matter of such discussions; any conclusions reached; all communications, if any, on this subject; and, by Bates number, any documents evidencing such consideration. Did SSBT release any ERISA Identify the date of any meetings or other breach of fiduciary duty claims in consideration of this subject; whether as part Illinois securities litigation? of the consideration the value of the released 8 claims was calculated; how the value of such claims was calculated; the committee, persons, and/or entity participating in such consideration; whether meetings were in person, telephonic, or otherwise; all communications, if any, between State Street and the Plans on this subject; and, by bates number, any documents evidencing such action or consideration. Describe how Plan purchases were Answer the interrogatory in its entirety. 9 listed in Illinois proof of claim Did SSBT consider whether Nothing further required. 10 participation in settlement would result in a prohibited transaction? Did SSBT communicate with Any supplement to the response is deferred Department of Labor re: until the waiver of work product is resolved. 11 participation of plans in settlement of Illinois securities litigation? SSBT’s understanding of who was Nothing further required. 14 party responsible for protecting interests of Plan Did any other fiduciary approve Nothing further required. 15 actions of SSBT in connection with Illinois securities litigation? Did SSBT consult with counsel Nothing further required. 16 for protection of Plan? Did SSBT consider whether any Identify the date of any meetings or other breach of ERISA fiduciary duty consideration of this subject; the committee, existed or should be brought in persons and/or entity participating n the Texas Securities Litigation? consideration; whether the meeting was in person, telephonic, or otherwise; the subject 17 matter of such discussions; any conclusions reached; all communications, if any, between State Street and the Plans on this subject; and, by Bates number, any documents evidencing such consideration. Did SSBT consider whether Plan Identify the date of any meetings or other had any claims and whether Plan consideration of this subject; the committee, should initiate litigation in Texas persons and/or entity participating n the Securities Litigation? consideration; whether the meeting was in 18 person, telephonic, or otherwise; the subject matter of such discussions; any conclusions reached; and, by Bates number, any documents evidencing such consideration. Did SSBT release any ERISA Answer the interrogatory in its entirety. 19 breach of fiduciary dury claim in Texas Securities Litigation? Did SSBT consider whether Plan Answer the interrogatory in its entirety. had additional sources of relief, 20 such as fiduciary liability insurance, in the Texas Securities Litigation? Did SSBT consider whether Plan Identify the date of any meetings or other should seek additional recovery in consideration of this subject; the committee, Texas Securities Litigation? person(s) and/or entity participating in the consideration; whether the meeting was in 21 person, telephonic, or otherwise; the subject matter of such discussions; any conclusions reached; all communications, if any, on this subject; and, by Bates number, any documents evidencing such consideration. Did SSBT consult with counsel Nothing further required. 22 regarding the Texas Securities Litigation? Describe how Plan purchases and Answer the interrogatory in its entirety. 23 sales were calculated and listed in the Texas proof of claim Describe the process by which the Answer the interrogatory in its entirety. decision was made as to whether 24 Plan should participate in the Texas Securities Litigation State SSBT’s understanding of Nothing further required. entity responsible for protecting 25 interests of Plan in the Texas Securities Litigation