Grimes v. District of Columbia Government
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________
) KEITH B. GRIMES, )
) Plaintiff, )
) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-0416 (RLW)
) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., )
) Defendants. )
___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 24, 2011, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment. In its May 31, 2011 Order, the Court advised the plaintiff, among other things, of his obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, that Order expressly warned the plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by July 1, 2011, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. The Court granted the plaintiff’s request for an extension of time, to July 7, 2011, yet, to date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor requested additional time to do so.
The Court will grant the defendants’ Motion to Treat [Their] Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment As Conceded. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
_______/s/____________________ DATE: July 20, 2011 ROBERT L. WILKINS
United States District Judge
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.