Bradley v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Bradley v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED MAY 25'2011 Latonya M. Bradley, ) Clerk. U.S. District & Bankruptcy ) Courts for the District of Columbia Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1J 1~7n ) Federal Bureau of Investigation, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is
required to dismiss a complaint upon a detennination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues the Federal Bureau of Investigation for
allegedly failing "to protect a citizen from violation of the color of law done by a Judge Noel T.
Johnson in D.C. Superior Court who is a conspiracy of silence to child abduction, frabricated
[sic] evidence, violation of [constitutional rights] [and] deprivation of rights that others have and
Tort." Complaint.
A complaint may be dismissed under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) as frivolous when it
describes fantastic or delusional scenarios, contains "fanciful factual allegation[s]," Neitzke v.
Williams,
490 U.S. 319, 325(1989), or lacks "an arguable basis in law and fact." Brandon v.
District of Columbia Bd. of Parole,
734 F.2d 56, 59(D.C. Cif. 1984). This complaint qualifies
for such treatment. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: May -.iJL, 2011
Reference
- Status
- Published