•

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAr 252011 cClert. u.s. District &Bankr Latonya M. Bradley, ) ourta tor the Dlstrtct at Cofu~~ra ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11 ,~6f. ) ) D.C. Superior Court, et aI., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its review of the plaintiff s pro se complaint and

application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will

be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring

dismissal of an action "at any time" the Court determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction).

Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues the Superior Court of the District of

Columbia, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, and two Superior Court judges. She has

stated no facts about the named defendants, and this Court lacks jurisdiction to review any of

their rulings. See 28 U.S.c. §§ 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional provisions); Fleming v. United

States,

(D.D.C. 1994), cert. denied

(1995). A separate

Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: May n, 2011 United States District Judge