Bradley v. Dc Superior Court

•

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAr 252011 cClert. u.s. District &Bankr Latonya M. Bradley, ) ourta tor the Dlstrtct at Cofu~~ra )

Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11 ,~6f. ) )

D.C. Superior Court, et aI., ) )

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its review of the plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring dismissal of an action "at any time" the Court determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction).

Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, and two Superior Court judges. She has stated no facts about the named defendants, and this Court lacks jurisdiction to review any of their rulings. See 28 U.S.c. §§ 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional provisions); Fleming v. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cert. denied 513 U.S. 1150 (1995). A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: May n, 2011

United States District Judge