District Court, District of Columbia, 2011

Obama-Carter v. United States Government

Obama-Carter v. United States Government
District Court, District of Columbia · Decided April 25, 2011 · Judge Reggie B. Walton
Obama-Carter v. United States Government

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED Audrey Obama-Carter, ) APR 2 5 2011 ) Clerk. U.S. District & Bankruptcy Plaintiff, ) Courts for the DIstrict of ColumbIa ) v. ) Civil Action No. United States, et aI., ) )

11 0783 ) )

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of the plaintiff s pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in Jorma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

The plaintiff sues a host of political figures and celebrities. See Complaint ("CompI.") Caption. Her accusations of rape, blackmail and extortion allegedly after she married President Barack Obama, see Compi. at I, and allegations that, inter alia, Oprah Winfrey willed her "3/4 of her estate but commited [sic] crimes on me and the State of New Jersey ... made her give me her entire estate .... , id. at 2, and Donald Trump "did not allow [her], Audrey Carter and President Obama to live together .... ," id., are the type of fantastic or delusional scenarios warranting dismissal under § 1915(e)(2) as frivolous. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); accord Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). )

Date: April W ,2011

I ) A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. /~

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.