Waker v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ )

JOSEPH R. WAKER, JR., ) )

Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-0658 (PLF) )

DEVON BROWN et al., ) )

Defendants. ) ____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is the motion of the remaining defendant, the District Columbia, to dismiss the complaint. See Order of December 9, 2010 (dismissing the complaint against the individual defendants). By Order of January 6, 2011, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, was advised consistent with Fox v. Strickland, 837 F.2d 507 (D.C. Cir. 1988), about his obligation to respond to the District of Columbia’s motion by February 7, 2011, or risk dismissal of the complaint on a conceded motion. Plaintiff has neither filed a response nor sought additional time to do so. The Court therefore will treat the pending motion as conceded and will now dismiss the case. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

DATE: March 3, 2011 United States District Judge