District Court, District of Columbia, 2011

London v. United States

London v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia · Decided February 15, 2011 · Civil Action No. 2010-1708 · Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
London v. United States

Opinion

UN1TE1) sTATEs 1)1sTR1CT C0URT F 1 L D FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA FEB l 5 2911 t y ‘ ' t & Bankrup 0 MICHAEL L@ND()N, ) Ccii§i\:§ \fj¢i§'thutzisl)tils?trict 01 Co\umbia Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. lO-l'/'OS UNlTED STATES, et al., § Defendants. g MEMORANDUM OPINION The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the Court would consider the plaintiff s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confmed. 28 U.S.C. § l9l5. To date, plaintiff has not submitted the required information Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. data »Ai@<t,t./~% / DATE; /245// @, 535// united states DistriétJudge '

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.