District Court, District of Columbia, 2011

Brown v. Holder

Brown v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia · Decided February 15, 2011 · Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Brown v. Holder

Opinion

UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT CoURT F 1 L E D

FoR THE 1)1sTR1CT oF CoLIJMBIA

FEB l 5 2011 _ ' t' t& Bankruptcy

ROBERT BROWN, ) C(i)\iii\t(s `f]orstli)ea\i)i;?crict of Golumbia Plaintiff, § v. g Civil Action No. 10-2225

ERIC HOLDER, et al., g

Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the Court would consider the plaintiff’ s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § l9l5. To date, plaintiff has not submitted the required inforrnation. Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to proceed l in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. i\/¢A~m.,’ / v

DATE: / D/ RD// United States Disti‘ict Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.