--------------------------- --_._----. ------- --------------- -- ---

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FEB ~ 8 2011 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia ) JAMES B. CRAWFORD, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11 Oalti ) D.B. DREW, ) ) Respondent. ) --------------------------~) MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court upon review of petitioner's application for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The application will

be granted and the petition will be dismissed.

The instant petition is substantially similar to that filed in a prior habeas action, Crawford

y. Drew, No. 09-2447,

(D.D.C. Dec. 30,2009), and it, too, must be dismissed

because a motion in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia under D.C. Code. § 23-110 is

petitioner's means of challenging his conviction and sentence. See id. "The mere denial of relief

by the local court[] does not render the local remedy inadequate or ineffective." Id.,

, at *2 (citations omitted).

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately on this same

date.

3