District Court, District of Columbia, 2012

Bell-Boston v. Pittman

Bell-Boston v. Pittman
District Court, District of Columbia · Decided November 16, 2012 · Judge Reggie B. Walton
Bell-Boston v. Pittman

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOV 1 6 2012 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia Kareemah Bell-Boston, ) )

Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12 1857 )

Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library, ) )

Defendant. ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction i~ available only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such facts warrants dismissal ofthe action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

The plaintiff is a District of Columbia resident "l'ooking to sue Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Library [in the District of Columbia] for Defamation of Character." Statement ofthe

N Case at 2. Since the complaint neither presents a federal question nor provides a basis for diversity jurisdiction, it will be dismissed. 1

DATE: October 2-/ , 2012

1 A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.