Evans v. Fenty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ )

JOY EVANS, et al., ) )

Plaintiffs, ) ) and ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) )

Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) Civil Action No. 76-293 (ESH) ) v. ) )

VINCENT GRAY, et al., ) )

Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )

ORDER

Pursuant to the “2010 Revision to the 2001 Plan for Compliance and Conclusion of Evans v. Fenty,”1 (“2010 Plan”), the Special Master, Clarence J. Sundram, has submitted four report and recommendations regarding defendants’ compliance with three of the nine areas specified therein: staff training, safeguarding personal possessions, and adequate budget. See Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Staff Training-Part I, July 6, 2012 [ECF No. 1318]; Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Safeguarding Personal Possessions, Sept. 26, 2012 [ECF No. 1336]; Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Staff Training-Part II, Sept. 28, 2012 [ECF No. 1338]; Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Adequate Budget, Oct. 5, 2012 [ECF No.

1341]. The Special Master recommends that the Court find that the defendants are in compliance in each of these areas. During today’s status conference, the parties confirmed that no objections would be filed with respect to any of these reports. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court APPROVES AND ADOPTS the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Staff Training-Part I [ECF No. 1318], the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Safeguarding Personal Possessions [ECF No. 1336], the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Staff Training-Part II [ECF No. 1338], and the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Regarding Adequate Budget [ECF No. 1341].

/s/ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge Date: October 26, 2012