District Court, District of Columbia, 2012

Nickens v. District of Columbia

Nickens v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia · Decided October 11, 2012 · Judge Ellen S. Huvelle
Nickens v. District of Columbia

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

:

DEMETRIUS NICKENS, :

: v. : Civil Action No. 12-0888 (ESH)

:

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., : ____________________________________:

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 4, 2012, defendant District of Columbia filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DC’s Mot. to Dismiss, Sept. 4, 2012 [ECF No. 15].) By Order dated September 5, 2012, the Court advised plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion by October 5, 2012, the Court may treat the motion as conceded. To date, plaintiff neither has filed an opposition to the motion and nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will grant the District of Columbia’s motion as conceded.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: October 11, 2012 ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE

United States District Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.