Lee v. Fulwood
Lee v. Fulwood
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA )
MARK ANTHONY LEE, ) )
Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1895 (BAH) )
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. et al., ) )
Respondents. ) )
MEMORANDUM
By Order of April 16, 2012, Petitioner was directed to respond by May 17, 2012, to the Government’s opposition to his petition for a writ of habeas corpus or risk summary dismissal of the petition, ECF No. 9. Petitioner has neither filed a response nor moved for additional time to do so. He therefore has not opposed Respondents’ documented reasons for denying the petition, see Gov’t’s Opp’n to Pet’r’s Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 8, at 4-7, with which the Court agrees and adopts for the purpose of denying the petition. A separate final order accompanies this Memorandum.
/s/ Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: June 4, 2012
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.