District Court, District of Columbia, 2012

Smith v. Nbc New Univision

Smith v. Nbc New Univision
District Court, District of Columbia · Decided May 11, 2012 · Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Smith v. Nbc New Univision

Opinion

FILED MAY 11 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District &Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DAVIS SMITH, ) )

Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12 0757 )

THE NBC NEW UNIVISION, ) )

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint.

The Court has reviewed plaintiffs complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even prose litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Plaintiffs complaint is so poorly written that the Court cannot discern a viable claim within this Court's jurisdiction, or identify a clear statement showing plaintiffs entitlement to the relief he seeks. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

~.~ ~'

United States Dist ct Judge '¥t!/-

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.