District Court, District of Columbia, 2012

Brown v. Woodley House, Incorporated.

Brown v. Woodley House, Incorporated.
District Court, District of Columbia · Decided March 29, 2012 · Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
Brown v. Woodley House, Incorporated.

Opinion

FILED

UNHED sTATEs DISTRICT coURr MAR 2 9 2012

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy

Courts for the District of Columbia )

Shiron Brown, ) )

Plaintiff, ) ) 5 v. ) Civil Action No. )

Woodley House, Inc., ) )

Defendant. ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. l2(h)(3).

Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues her former landlord based in the District of Columbia for allegedly terminating her lease before she could prepare to leave. She also complains about seemingly unrelated matters and, in one instance, states serious criminal allegations against individuals who are not named defendants. See Compl. at 2. The complaint presents neither a federal question nor a basis for diversity jurisdiction because the parties are not

United S}cates District Judge

Date: Marc , 12

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.