District Court, District of Columbia, 2012

Rumble v. Johnson

Rumble v. Johnson
District Court, District of Columbia · Decided February 9, 2012 · Judge Amy Berman Jackson
Rumble v. Johnson

Opinion

UNITED STATES MSTRICT CoURT

FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA FEB - 9 2012

CRAIG E. RUMBLE, z j c(i>liiié ingii)l;irta§ gii':i»iiiilii¢ia

Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.

CAROL P. JOHNSON, t

Defendant.

M\EMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, a New Jersey resident, purports to bring a breach of contract action against his mother, also a New Jersey resident, arising from defendant’s failure to produce authentic documents with which plaintiff could obtain a United States passport. He demands "that the Defendant be held accountable for her action to the lilllest extent under the law," plus damages of $3 million. Compl. at 5. j l j Federal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In addition, federal district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the suit is between citizens of different States. See 28 U.S.C. § l332(a). This complaint neither states a federal claim nor establishes diversity of citizenship of the parties. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

An Order accompanies this Memoran um Opinion.

§,§li\

I`Jnited Ftates District Judge

DATE:

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.