Banks v. Food and Drug Administration
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _]AN 3 1 2012
Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
RAYNOLDO BANKS’ ) Courts for the District of Co|umbia
Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action N0. 2
FOOD AND DRUG ADl\/IINISTRATION, §
Defendant. §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The plaintiff identifies the defendant as "FEDERAL DRUGE AMINSTRIONS," which presumably is a reference to the Food and Drug Administration. The court notes that plaintiff filed an identical complaint against this same defendant, and the complaint was dismissed without prejudice for its failure to comply with the basic notice pleading requirements of Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Banks v. Food & DrugAdmin., N0. 12-0065 (D.D.C. Jan. l7, 2012). The instant complaint is a repetitive lawsuit, and the court will dismiss it under 29 U.S.C. § l9l5(e)(2) as frivolous and malicious.
An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.
Aél/
Un` d S t?istrict Judge
DATE; /» /?9//
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.