Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PATRICK COLLINS, INC.,

Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 11-58 (RMU/JMF) DOES 1-72,

Defendants.

ORDER

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is, hereby, ORDERED that plaintiff show cause in writing by February 10, 2012, why this Court can assert jurisdiction over any defendant (a) who is not domiciled in the District of Columbia, or (b) as to whom plaintiff lacks a good faith basis to assert that he or she committed the act that is the premise of the plaintiff’s claim for relief in the District of Columbia, and why venue is proper unless the defendant resides in the District of Columbia. It is further, hereby, ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Take Additional Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof [#16] is DENIED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Digitally signed by John M.

Facciola

DN: c=US, st=DC, ou=District of Columbia, email=John_M._Facciola@dc d.uscourts.gov, o=U.S. District

Court, District of Columbia, cn=John M. Facciola

Date: 2012.01.19 10:16:31 -05'00' ___________________________

JOHN M. FACCIOLA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE