Swanson Group mfg.llc v. Salazar

District Court, District of Columbia

Swanson Group mfg.llc v. Salazar

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SWANSON GROUP MFG. LLC, et at., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 10-1843 (RJL) ) KEN SALAZAR, et at., ) ) ) Defendants. )

~ORDER June Zb, 2013 [## 41, 44, 45]

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 41] is

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; it is further

ORDERED that defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 45] is

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; it is further

ORDERED that defendant-intervenors' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

[Dkt. # 44] is DENIED; it is further

ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs on Counts One and Two

of the Amended Complaint; it is further

ORDERED that defendant Ken Salazar and/or his successors shall sell or offer for

sale the declared annual sustained yield capacity of timber for the Medford and Roseburg

districts for each year; it is further ORDERED that the Owl Estimation Methodology is set aside and shall not be

used by defendants Ken Salazar, Tom Vilsack, and/or their successors unless and until the

methodology is submitted to the rulemaking procedures of

5 U.S.C. § 553

; it is further

ORDERED that Count Three of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as

moot; and it is further

ORDERED that Counts Four and Five of the Amended Complaint are

DISMISSED as conceded.

SO ORDERED.

RICHARD . N United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Published