UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 15-0025 (PLF) ) CHRISTOPHER FORD, et. al. ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day, it is

hereby

ORDERED that Fenwick’s motion to compel, Dkt. 103, is DENIED as moot; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Grant’s motion to compel is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Hager’s motion to compel is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Sanders’s motion to compel is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Grant’s motion to exclude cooperating witness

testimony, Dkt. 117, is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Grant’s motion for a reliability hearing, Dkt. 122, is

DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Ford’s motion to exclude cooperating witness

testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Fenwick’s motion to exclude cooperating witness

testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED as moot; it is FURTHER ORDERED that Hager’s motion to exclude cooperating witness

testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Leach’s motion to exclude cooperating witness

testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Ford’s motion to compel, Dkt. 119, is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Grant’s motion to compel is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Hager’s motion to compel is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Sanders’s motion to compel is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Leach’s motion to compel is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: February 4, 2016

2