District Court, District of Columbia, 2016

Hunter v. Angela

Hunter v. Angela
District Court, District of Columbia · Decided April 27, 2016 · Judge Rudolph Contreras
Hunter v. Angela

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JAS`ON '1`. HUNTER, ) )

Pla.intiff, ) ) Case: ‘l;‘l 6-cv-00785

V_ ) Assigned To : Unassigned ) Assign_ Date : 4!27/2016

IUDGE ANGELA COWDEN, et al_, ) Description: Pro Se Gen. Civ. - )

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se civil complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice.

It appears that a Florida court has ordered plaintiff to pay child support for his minor son, notwithstanding his status as a non-custodial parent, see generally Compl. at 3-5 (page numbers designated by the Court), who has "no visitation right[s], decision making authority, or any rights . . . as the natural and biological father,” z`d. at 6. He brings this action for "the restoration of [his`] reputation, parental rights, [and] relief from any arrears . . . ordered by the judge and/or enforced by the Florida Departrnent of Revenue (Child Support Enforcement Division),’j’ among other relief Ia'.

F ederal district courts have jurisdiction civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In addition, federal district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,0’00, and the suit is between citizens of different states. See 28 U.S.C. § l332(a). The complaint does not articulate a claim arising under the United States Constitution or federal law. And even though plaintiff demands damages in excess of $75,000, because all the parties appear to reside and conduct business in Florida, plaintiff does not demonstrate diversity of citizenship Accordingly, the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.