Pigford v. Veneman
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________ ) TIMOTHY PIGFORD et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 97-1978 (PLF) ) TOM VILSACK, Secretary, ) United States Department of Agriculture, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) ) CECIL BREWINGTON et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 98-1693 (PLF) ) TOM VILSACK, Secretary, ) United States Department of Agriculture, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )
ORDER
For the reasons explained in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day,
it is hereby
ORDERED that the Wises’ Motion to Compel Written Consent to Op Out
[Dkt. 2002] is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Wises’ Motion for Contempt and to Enforce the
Pigford Consent Decree [Dkt. 2003] is DENIED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that the Wises’ Emergency Motion for Preliminary
Injunction Against Foreclosure [Dkt. 2006] is DENIED as moot; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Wises’ Emergency Motion for an Order on
Dkt. 2003 [Dkt. 2031] is DENIED as moot; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Wises’ Motion for a Declaratory Judgment
[Dkt. 2037] is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Bateses’ Motion [Dkt. 2017] is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Bateses’ Objection [Dkt. 2018] is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Parker’s Motion for a Declaratory Judgment
[Dkt. 2040] is DENIED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Cowtown’s Motion to Intervene and Freeze the
Remaining Funds [Dkt. 2048] is DENIED. This is a final appealable order. See FED. R. APP. P.
4(a).
SO ORDERED.
/s/_______________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge
DATE: September 15, 2016
2
Reference
- Status
- Published