United States v. Toyobo Co. Ltd
United States v. Toyobo Co. Ltd
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., ) AARON J. WESTRICK, Ph.D., ) Civil Action No. 04-0280 (PLF) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) SECOND CHANCE BODY ARMOR, INC., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Civil Action No. 07-1144 (PLF) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TOYOBO COMPANY, LTD., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day, it is
hereby
ORDERED that the United States’ motion for reconsideration [Dkt. 450 in Civil
Action No. 04-0280 and Dkt. 184 in Civil Action No. 07-1144] is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the beginning of Toyobo’s alleged fraud for all
claims is July 2001; it is FURTHER ORDERED that only the following claims survive summary
judgment and shall proceed to trial:
1. Common law claims of fraud and unjust enrichment against all
defendants concerning both the BPVGPA and the GSA MAS;
2. Fraudulent inducement under the FCA against all defendants concerning
both the BPVGPA and the GSA MAS;
3. Express and implied false certification under the FCA against all
defendants concerning only the GSA MAS and limited to the United States’ theory that the
Second Chance’s 6% catalog guarantee was a durability requirement.
SO ORDERED.
_________/s/_______________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN DATE: July 14, 2017 United States District Judge
2
Reference
- Status
- Published