District Court, District of Columbia, 2017

United States v. Reddix

United States v. Reddix
District Court, District of Columbia · Decided December 13, 2017 · Judge Ellen S. Huvelle
United States v. Reddix

Opinion

CONSENT FOR MOD|F|CAT|ON OF SUPERV|SED RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

District of columbia F l L E D

NDV t 3 2017

C|Qrk, U,S1 District & Bankruptc;

UNITED STATEs oF AMERICA ) counsfmfhems.t"'*’~“”""""”""

Plaintiff ) vs. ) Criminal No. ll-O30 )

DAVID REDDIX )

Defendant )

CONSENT TO MODIFY SUPERVISED RELEASE

All parties agree, for the reasons Set forth on the record, that the Defendant’s conditions of supervised release should be modified In accordance with said agreement, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that the Defendant’s conditions of supervised release be modified as follows:

Defendant will comply with the wage allotment agreement in accordance with the U.S. Attorney’s Offlce to have $25.00 taken from.his wages bi-weekly as payment toward his restitution balance.

Dated: December 8 2017 agistrate Judge /, /

The assigned Magistrate Judge having recommended that the conditions of the Defendant’s supervised release be modified, it is ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted

Dated: f Q\\t J;L'l Q(/C-l\)g ilj&)\/<[\Sz/

U.S. District Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.