Souza v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
Souza v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
Opinion of the Court
Defendants moved to dismiss Counts III, V, and the punitive damages claim in Count IV (Docket # 78) of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, and renewed their motion (Docket # 93) as to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint.
Defendants' Motion is DENIED as to the claim for punitive damages included in Count IV, which plaintiff has sufficiently pleaded and is entitled to develop in discovery.
Two defendants have since moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Docket # 100). This order in no way resolves that motion, which is not yet ripe.
The term "personal representative" "includes executor, administrator, successor personal representative, special administrator, special personal representative and persons who perform substantially the same function under the law governing their status." Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 190B, § 1-201. See Bennett v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. CV 2017-0603-BLS1,
Reference
- Full Case Name
- David Leonard SOUZA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Karen Marie Souza v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company (sued as successor to Sierra Talc Company and United Talc Company) and Imerys Talc America, Inc. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Luzenac America, Inc. successor-in-interest to Cyprus Industrial Minerals Company and Metropolitan Talc Co.)
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published