Segar v. Ashcroft
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
HENRY SEGAR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v. Civ. Action No. 77-0081 (EGS)
WILLIAM P. BARR, as U.S. Attorney General,
Defendant.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”), the defendant’s objections, plaintiffs’ response to
those objections, the relevant law, and for the reasons stated
in the Memorandum Opinion, the court adopts in part the R&R.
Accordingly it is
ORDERED, that plaintiffs’ motion for compliance order is
GRANTED IN PART, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, that the parties shall reconstitute the
Working Group, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, that the Employment Opportunity Monitoring
Committee shall continue to monitor the Drug Enforcement
Agency’s (“DEA”) compliance with this Court’s Order to cease
discrimination, and the DEA shall continue to produce annual
reports through its EEO Office, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, that defendant shall submit a modified plan for promotions to GS-14 and GS-15 level positions to
plaintiffs and the Working Group. The plan shall include
specific time frames and deadlines for the various steps in the
promotion process, and rating criteria to evaluate promotion
candidates’ accomplishments. If plaintiffs and the Working Group
concur with the modified plan, the parties shall seek a petition
to allow implementation of the plan for future promotion
practices, subject to a decision by the parties and Working
Group as to whether the plan requires further validation, and it
is
FURTHER ORDERED, that if the modified plan requires
validation, the validation shall be conducted by a mutually
acceptable third-party vendor, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, that plaintiffs shall provide to defendant
a detailed request for attorney’s fees from the period of June
1996 to present. Defendant shall either concede the amount or
file an opposition to the fees, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, that plaintiffs shall state with certainty
the damage model they propose and allow defendant to either
concede the validity of the model or file an opposition. If
defendant does file an opposition, the Court will order a
discovery period including depositions of experts. If there is
no agreement after the discovery period the Court shall resolve
the damages issue.
2 SO ORDERED.
Signed: Emmet G. Sullivan United States District Judge June 25, 2019
3
Reference
- Status
- Published