In Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - Mdl 1869
In Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - Mdl 1869
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ) ANTITRUST LITIGATION ) ) MDL Docket No. 1869 ) Miscellaneous No. 07-0489 (PLF) This document relates to: ) ) ALL DIRECT PURCHASER CASES ) __________________________________________) OXBOW CARBON & MINERALS LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1049 (PLF) ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the opinion issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Rail Freight Defendants’ Motion for Certification Pursuant
to
28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Supporting Statement of Points and Authorities [Dkt. No. 1010] is
GRANTED;1 it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Oxbow Defendants’ Motion for Certification
Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Supporting Statement of Points and Authorities, Oxbow
1 Unless otherwise specified, citations to docket entries refer to the first above captioned matter, In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1869, Miscellaneous No. 07-0489. Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., Civil Action No. 11-1049 [Dkt. No. 220] is
GRANTED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), the Court’s
February 19, 2021 Order [Dkt. No. 1007] (“the Order”) denying Defendants’ Motion to Exclude
Interline-Related Communications from Consideration for Class Certification or Any Other
Purpose Prohibited by
49 U.S.C. § 10706[Dkt. No. 417] and Defendants’ Motion and
Memorandum of Law Regarding the Interpretation and Application of
49 U.S.C. § 10706[Dkt.
No. 927] is hereby certified for immediate appeal; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Order is amended to include the following
statement: This Order is appropriate for immediate appeal because it involves controlling
questions of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion, and immediate
appeal of these issues may materially advance the ultimate termination of this litigation.
SO ORDERED.
/s/
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: June 15, 2021
2
Reference
- Status
- Published