Bin Lep v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia

Bin Lep v. Trump

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MOHAMMED NAZIR BIN LEP,

Petitioner,

v. Civil Action No. 20-3344 (JDB) JOSEPH R. BIDEN et al.,

Respondents.

ORDER Upon consideration of [62] respondents’ Motion to Hold Habeas Petition in Abeyance

Pending Completion of Military Commission Proceedings, and [64] petitioner’s Cross-Motion for

a Permanent Injunction, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated in the

accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that [62] respondents’ abeyance motion is GRANTED IN PART AND

DENIED IN PART; it is further

ORDERED that respondents’ abeyance motion is GRANTED as to the following claims:

claims one through eight of [40] the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; it is further

ORDERED that respondents’ abeyance motion is DENIED as to the following claims:

claims nine and ten of the habeas petition; it is further

ORDERED that [64] petitioner’s cross-motion for a permanent injunction is DENIED as

moot; and it is further

ORDERED that the parties shall submit by not later than January 27, 2022 a joint status

report proposing a schedule for further proceedings in this case.

1 SO ORDERED.

/s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge

Dated: January 13, 2022

2

Reference

Status
Published