Murphy v. District of Columbia
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ROBERT MURPHY,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 18-1478 (JDB) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,
Defendant.
ORDER
Upon consideration of [44] defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and for the reasons
stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART;
it is further
ORDERED that defendant’s motion is granted as to plaintiff’s FMLA and DCHRA
retaliation claims; it is further
ORDERED that defendant’s motion is denied without prejudice as to plaintiff’s FMLA
and DCFMLA interference claims and plaintiff’s Title VII retaliation claim; it is further
ORDERED that the parties shall submit additional briefing discussing whether defendant
is entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s ADA failure-to-accommodate claim; it is further
ORDERED that the additional briefing shall be submitted in accordance with the
following schedule:
1. Plaintiff shall file by not later than March 22, 2022, a memorandum that shall not exceed
10 pages, as well as any relevant supporting documents, explaining why the Court should not grant
1 defendant summary judgment on plaintiff’s ADA failure-to-accommodate claim for the reason
that plaintiff never requested a reasonable accommodation under the ADA;
2. Defendant shall file any memorandum, not to exceed 10 pages, and supporting
documents in response by not later than April 5, 2022.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge
Dated: March 2, 2022
2
Reference
- Status
- Published