Murphy v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Murphy v. District of Columbia

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ROBERT MURPHY,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 18-1478 (JDB) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,

Defendant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of [44] defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and for the reasons

stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that defendant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART;

it is further

ORDERED that defendant’s motion is granted as to plaintiff’s FMLA and DCHRA

retaliation claims; it is further

ORDERED that defendant’s motion is denied without prejudice as to plaintiff’s FMLA

and DCFMLA interference claims and plaintiff’s Title VII retaliation claim; it is further

ORDERED that the parties shall submit additional briefing discussing whether defendant

is entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s ADA failure-to-accommodate claim; it is further

ORDERED that the additional briefing shall be submitted in accordance with the

following schedule:

1. Plaintiff shall file by not later than March 22, 2022, a memorandum that shall not exceed

10 pages, as well as any relevant supporting documents, explaining why the Court should not grant

1 defendant summary judgment on plaintiff’s ADA failure-to-accommodate claim for the reason

that plaintiff never requested a reasonable accommodation under the ADA;

2. Defendant shall file any memorandum, not to exceed 10 pages, and supporting

documents in response by not later than April 5, 2022.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge

Dated: March 2, 2022

2

Reference

Status
Published