Organic Trade Association v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia
Judge Paul L. Friedman

Organic Trade Association v. United States Department of Agriculture

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) ORGANIC TRADE ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-1875 (PLF) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) AGRICULTURE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the United States Department of Agriculture’s (“USDA”) [Dkt.

No. 142] Motion for Voluntary Remand is GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the National Organic Program (NOP); Organic

Livestock and Poultry Practices Rule (“Withdrawal Rule”),

83 Fed. Reg. 10,775

(Mar. 13, 2018)

is REMANDED WITHOUT VACATUR to the USDA for further consideration of the issues

presented; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Organic Trade Association’s (“OTA”) [Dkt. No. 95]

Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that OTA’s [Dkt. No. 140] Motion for Summary

Judgment on its Third Amended Complaint is DENIED as moot; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the USDA’s [Dkt. No. 149] Motion for Summary

Judgment is DENIED as moot; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint status report in this action

on the same date they file their status report ordered in Center for Environmental Health v.

Vilsack,

2022 WL 658965

, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2022).

SO ORDERED.

/s/ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge

DATE: March 30, 2022

2

Reference

Status
Published