McAfee v. Biden, Jr.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ALEXANDER JUSTIN MCAFEE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 24-02334 (UNA) ) ) JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR. et al., ) ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This action, brought pro se, is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint against President
Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Secretary of State Antony Blinken for breach of
contract, ECF No. 1, and Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. The
Court will grant the application and dismiss this action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(requiring immediate dismissal of a case upon a determination that the complaint is frivolous).
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants breached a “written” contract made on April 19, 2024, to
“provide documented evidence that I, My Self have knowing and willingly with full understanding
and disclosure have entered into the Offer/Contract that was presented by an instrumentality of the
United States, namely the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania[.]” ECF No. 1 at 4. The breach
occurred when “Defendants . . . failed to Answer in the prescribed time as set forth into the
Counter-Offer, a.k.a Conditional Acceptance Upon Proof of Claim.”
Id.Plaintiff posits that
Defendants have acquiesced apparently in his offer for them “to step down from any and all offices
held public and private, and never run for public or private office again.”
Id.A complaint supported, as here, by allegations lacking “an arguable basis either in law or
in fact” may be dismissed as frivolous. Neitzke v. Williams,
490 U.S. 319, 325(1989). The term
frivolous “embraces not only the inarguable legal conclusion, but also the fanciful factual
allegation.”
Id.Consequently, this case will be dismissed by separate order.
_________/s/_____________ JIA M. COBB Date: September 25, 2024 United States District Judge
2
Reference
- Status
- Published