Nierenhausen v. United States of America
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
PASCHA STOIT NIERENHAUSEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-2300 (UNA) ) THE UNITED STATES, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on consideration of Plaintiff’s application to proceed in
forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), and pro se Complaint (ECF No. 1). The Court GRANTS the
application and DISMISSES the complaint and this civil action without prejudice.
As best the Court can tell, having reviewed the complaint and exhibits, this action
pertains to the custody of Plaintiff’s daughter. Generally, “a federal court will not take
jurisdiction over a case if that would require it to grant a divorce, determine alimony or support
obligations, or resolve parental conflicts over the custody of their children.” Bennett v. Bennett,
682 F.2d 1039, 1042(D.C. Cir. 1982) (citations omitted); see Ankenbrandt v. Richards,
504 U.S. 689, 703(1992). Matters regarding the interests of Plaintiff’s daughter are “within the peculiar
province, experience, and competence of the state courts.” Bennett,
682 F.2d at 1039.
Because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the complaint and this civil action
must be dismissed. An Order is issued separately.
/s/ JIA M. COBB United States District Judge DATE: August 28, 2025
Reference
- Status
- Published